Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Carter v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided August 20, 1981No. 3-880A250Published

1ConcurrenceStaton, Judge

I concur in the majority’s conclusion that cumulative punishment for Carter’s two convictions offends the Double Jeopardy Clause of the United States Constitution. The imposition of consecutive sentences in this case for reckless homicide, IC 1976, 35-42-1-5 (Burns Code Ed., 1979 Repl.) (amended 1980), and for causing death while driving and being intoxicated, IC 1976, 9^1-54(b)(l) (Burns Code Ed., 1980 Repl.) (amended 1980 and 1981), clearly subjects Carter to multiple punishment for the “same offense.” However, the reasoning employed by the majority does little to sustain its conclusion.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Whalen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API