Legal Opinion

Tea v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 18, 1970No. 42605PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WOODLEY, Presiding Judge.

The offense is murder with malice; the punishment, death.

This is a companion case to Roy Earl David v. State, 453 S.W.2d 172, this day decided, they having been jointly indicted on July 5, 1967, for the murder of Robert Farley, but separately tried.

The record reflects that on July 25, 1967, notice in writing in open court signed by Thomas C. Dunn, Assistant District Attorney, was filed making known that the state would seek the death penalty as proper punishment of the defendant Cornelius Tea. Appellant’s trial began November 13, 1967.

Appellant’s first ground…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. David v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1970
  4. Branch v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969
  5. Harrington v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Villareal v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
  2. Rinehart v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
  3. Casarez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
  4. Stanley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
  5. Schoier v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API