Legal Opinion

Hix v. Kiser & Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 24, 1898PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Levy and claim. Before Judge Hutchins. Banks superior court. March term, 1897.

1Opinion of the CourtLumpkin, P. J.

In November, 1884, W. D. Hix, of Haber-sham county, conveyed to his wife, Mary E. Hix, a tract of land situated in Banks county. His deed to her was not, however, recorded until September, 1893. In November, 1891, Hix conveyed the same land to M. C. & J. F. Kiser & Co. to secure a debt due to them. Subsequently, Bates, Kingsbery & Co. filed an equitable petition in the superior court of Haber-sham county against Hix and his wife and Kiser & Co., alleging, in substance, that Hix was indebted to them upon certain judgments; that Mrs. Hix, fraudulently, and in pursuance *739of a scheme collusively…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Clayton v. StetsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  2. Fulgham v. PateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886
  3. Smith v.BryanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1864
  4. Bivins v. BivinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1867
  5. Royston v. RoystonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1857

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Colley v. Atlanta & West Point RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
  2. Vizard v. MoodySupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  3. Radcliffe v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932
  4. Norton v. GrahamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  5. Bradley v. BurnsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API