Legal Opinion

Moore v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 5, 2000No. 99-0368PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

We affirm appellant’s convictions of possession of over 20 grams of cannabis, possession of cocaine with intent to sell or deliver, and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. At trial, a detective testified that he had test fired a gun seized from a car occupied by appellant. Defense counsel objected to the admission of the spent round into evidence, primarily on relevancy grounds, not as a discovery violation under Richardson v. State, 246 So.2d 771 (Fla.1971). Defense counsel did not object to the detective testifying that he had test fired the gun, which was relevant to prove that…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Richardson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1971

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Meadows v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API