Legal Opinion

Dyno v. Dyno, Jr.

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 13, 2020No. 3:19-cv-01966Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA THOMAS LAMONT DYNO, et al., : Plaintiffs : CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:19-1966 v. : (MANNION, D.J.) ALBERT DYNO, JR., Executor of : the ESTATE OF ROSMARIE STERCHAK, Deceased, : Defendant ORDER Presently before the court is report and recommendation (“Report”) of Magistrate Judge Joseph F. Saporito, Jr, (Doc. 11), which recommends that this action be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The plaintiffs have filed objections to the Report, (Doc. 12), and, in response, the defendant filed a brief in opposition to the objections,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. RaddatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Henderson v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
  3. Brown v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
  4. Univac Dental Co. v. Dentsply International, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
  5. Princess Lida of Thurn and Taxis v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API