Bizmark, Inc. v. Industrial Gas & Supply Co., Inc.
District Court, W.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
JONES, Chief Judge.
In this action for the balance of the deferred purchase price under a commercial asset purchase agreement, I find that the applicable statutes of limitations bar certain of the amounts claimed. In addition, I find that the notice condition of an indemnity clause in the agreement is not applicable.
I
Bizmark, Inc. (“Bizmark”), Roy L. Wells, Jr., Roger N. Wells, Industrial Gas & Supply, Inc. (“Industrial”), and David Luther (“Luther”) entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement dated June 30, 1995 (“Agreement”). By the terms of the Agreement, Bizmark promised to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bay Area Laundry & Dry Cleaning Pension Trust Fund v. Ferbar Corp. of California, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. v. Sisson & Ryan, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1987
- Lerner v. Gudelsky Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1985
- High Knob Associates v. DouglasSupreme Court of Virginia · 1995
- Heirs of Roberts v. Coal ProcessingSupreme Court of Virginia · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Faison v. HughsonRoanoke County Circuit Court · 2010
- Bizmark, Inc. v. Air Products, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2006
- Bo v. TangDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2023