Legal Opinion

Bizmark, Inc. v. Industrial Gas & Supply Co., Inc.

District Court, W.D. Virginia

Decided March 2, 2005No. 2:04CV00109PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

JONES, Chief Judge.

In this action for the balance of the deferred purchase price under a commercial asset purchase agreement, I find that the applicable statutes of limitations bar certain of the amounts claimed. In addition, I find that the notice condition of an indemnity clause in the agreement is not applicable.

I

Bizmark, Inc. (“Bizmark”), Roy L. Wells, Jr., Roger N. Wells, Industrial Gas & Supply, Inc. (“Industrial”), and David Luther (“Luther”) entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement dated June 30, 1995 (“Agreement”). By the terms of the Agreement, Bizmark promised to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bay Area Laundry & Dry Cleaning Pension Trust Fund v. Ferbar Corp. of California, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. v. Sisson & Ryan, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1987
  3. Lerner v. Gudelsky Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1985
  4. High Knob Associates v. DouglasSupreme Court of Virginia · 1995
  5. Heirs of Roberts v. Coal ProcessingSupreme Court of Virginia · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Faison v. HughsonRoanoke County Circuit Court · 2010
  2. Bizmark, Inc. v. Air Products, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2006
  3. Bo v. TangDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API