Legal Opinion

Gardner v. . McConnaughey

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 20, 1911PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by defendant from Lane, J., at June Term, 1911, of BubKE. Tbe facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the Court by Mr. Chief Justice Claris.

1Opinion of the CourtClark, C. J.

Execution having been issued upon a judgment-taken before a justice of the peace, the sheriff, without levying upon the personal property of the defendant, summoned a jury of appraisers, who filed an itemized valuation of such property amounting to $740.62, and reported that, after deducting the $500 personal property exemption, the defendant possessed $240.62 of property which was subject to sale of execution, but without specifying and setting apart the articles which should be exempt from sale finder the execution, as required by Revisal, 697. Tbe defendant filed exceptions to tbe report…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jones v. . AlsbrookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  2. Campbell v. . WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
  3. State Ex Rel. McD. Pate & Co. v. HarperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Household Finance Corp. v. EllisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
  2. Williams v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  3. Befarrah v. Spell.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API