Legal Opinion

State v. Running Shield

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 2015No. 27339PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SEVERSON, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Antonio Running Shield was searched pursuant to a search warrant with an “all persons” provision. He was found in possession of illegal drugs and subsequently convicted of possession of a controlled substance and possession of marijuana. On appeal, he asserts that the affidavit in support of the search warrant lacked probable cause for the “all persons” provision and therefore the circuit court erred by fading to suppress evidence obtained as a result of the search. We affirm.

Background

[¶ 2.] On November 6, 2012, a confidential informant approached law enforcement in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Herring v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. State v. De SimoneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1972
  5. State v. JacksonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. FischerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  2. State v. JonesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  3. State v. Ostby & OlmstedSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  4. State v. JonesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API