Legal Opinion · Dissent

Melnick v. Melnick

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 7, 1941No. Appeal, 77Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion by

Kenwokthey, J.:

I would affirm the order sustaining the preliminary objections. If Melnick had claimed the right to share in Helen Melnick’s personal estate if she should predecease him, or had made any other similar claim, I would be compelled to bow to the authority of Moore v. Moore, 344 Pa. 324, 25 A. (2d) 130, and hold that the lower court had jurisdiction.

The majority opinion states: “Melnick averred at some length the injurious effects on his personal status and his personal and property rights occasioned by said colorable and unlawful Nevada decree ......” Let’s…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Moore v. MooreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  2. Link Building & Loan Ass'n v. MelnickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API