Legal Opinion
United States v. Board of County Com'rs
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma
Decided February 25, 1936No. 2155PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRANKLIN E. KENNAMER, District Judge.
By this action the United States seeks to recover for its Indian ward, Cecilia Guittar Rappuie, taxes assessed against her allotment as a member of the Pawnee Tribe of Indians, for the years 1919 to 1930, inclusive, and paid by her, in the total amount of $916.94.
The parties stipulated as to the following facts:
Cecilia Guittar Rappuie is an adult member of the Pawnee Tribe of Indians in Oklahoma, and as such, .under an Act of Congress, approved February 8, 1887 (24 Stat. 388), was allotted certain lands in Pawnee county, Okl. The United States issued a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ward v. Board of Commr's of Love Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
- United States v. Board of Com'rsDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1934
- Heacock v. Tripp CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
3Cited by10 opinions
- Lakefront Realty Corp. v. LorenzIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
- Board of Com'rs of Caddo County, Okl. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
- Board of Com'rs of Jackson County v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1938
- County of Thurston, State of Nebraska v. AndrusCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
- LaSalle National Bank v. RosewellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.