Legal Opinion
Hall Laboratories, Inc. v. National Aluminate Corp.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided January 22, 1951No. Civ. 1192PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEAHY, Chief Judge.
Defendant’s motion for summary judgment was denied. D.C., 93 F.Supp. 376. It was there suggested if the Fink-Richardson patent and plaintiffs’ practices do not correspond ■ with ■ the teachings of the Fresenius text the prayers of the complaint at bar should' be denied. Defendant contends that a finding in its favor on this issue will be dispositive of the case.
In addition, defendant repeats its contention that because of the compromise and settlement of the previous litigation, the license agreement entered into between the parties was a part of the settlement and hence…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Automatic Radio Mfg. Co., Inc. v. Hazeltine Research, IncSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Scott Paper Co. v. Marcalus Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co. v. Formica Insulation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Casco Products Corporation v. Sinko Tool & Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
- Hall Laboratories, Inc. v. Economics Laboratory, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1948
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Hoyt, Inc. v. Born (In Re Born)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 1981
- O'DONNELL v. Watson Bros. Transportation CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1960
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Radio Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1952
- Reines Distributors, Inc. v. Admiral CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1965
- Larsen v. PowellDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1954
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.