Legal Opinion

Cruzan v. City of Paris

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 28, 1996No. 69119PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAROHL, Acting Presiding Judge.

City of Paris (City), employer, appeals from Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s (Commission) workers’ compensation award to employee, David Cruzan. City argues the Commission erred in awarding benefits because the evidence compels a finding Cruzan’s accident did not arise out of and in the course of his employment. We affirm.

City employed Cruzan as an electrical lineman. On May 22,1992, in the Gilmore building, which was owned by City, Cruzan was repairing florescent lights when he fell and was injured. One week before Cruzan’s fall, City leased a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wamhoff v. Wagner Electric Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1945
  2. Brenneisen v. Leach's Standard Service StationMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Stockman v. J.C. Industries, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Saidawi v. Giovanni's Little PlaceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Hilton v. Pizza HutMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hampton v. Big Boy Steel ErectionSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
  2. Tangblade v. Lear Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. Heiskell v. Golden City Foundry, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Wisely v. SYSCO FoodsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API