Cruzan v. City of Paris
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
KAROHL, Acting Presiding Judge.
City of Paris (City), employer, appeals from Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s (Commission) workers’ compensation award to employee, David Cruzan. City argues the Commission erred in awarding benefits because the evidence compels a finding Cruzan’s accident did not arise out of and in the course of his employment. We affirm.
City employed Cruzan as an electrical lineman. On May 22,1992, in the Gilmore building, which was owned by City, Cruzan was repairing florescent lights when he fell and was injured. One week before Cruzan’s fall, City leased a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wamhoff v. Wagner Electric Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1945
- Brenneisen v. Leach's Standard Service StationMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
- Stockman v. J.C. Industries, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1993
- Saidawi v. Giovanni's Little PlaceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
- Hilton v. Pizza HutMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hampton v. Big Boy Steel ErectionSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
- Tangblade v. Lear Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2001
- Heiskell v. Golden City Foundry, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2008
- Wisely v. SYSCO FoodsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998