Legal Opinion
Van Schaick v. Wannemacher
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided February 1, 1886PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Error to tbe Common Pleas, No. 1, of Philadelphia County to review a judgment for plaintiff in an action for breach of contract.
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam :
There is no error in the rulings of the court as to the law applicable to this case. It depended on the finding of facts. They were well submitted to the jury, and no cause .for disturbing the verdict is shown.
Judgment affirmed.
2Cited by4 opinions
- Bergstrom v. SpellmanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1919
- Central Maine Medical Center v. BurwellDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2016
- Nieman v. CoudranSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1880
- Rhodes v. BlackSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1882