Legal Opinion
State v. Vale
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided January 31, 1995No. Nos. 93-KA-895, 93-KA-972PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
liGAUDIN, Judge.
Appellants Gayle P. Neidhardt and Donald J. Vale were each convicted by a jury in the 24th Judicial District Court of possession with intent to distribute heroin, in violation of LSA-R.S. 40:966. Both were sentenced to life imprisonment without benefit of parole, probation or suspension of sentence and both were ordered to pay fines.
Vale’s sentence is to run concurrent with sentences imposed in federal court and in the 24th Judicial District Court.
The denial of parole is not authorized by LSA-R.S. 40:966(B); consequently, this prohibition must be stricken from the sentences.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. PrieurSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
- State v. BradySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1980
- State v. OvertonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1976
- State v. CranmerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1975
- State v. FabacherSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. ValeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1996
- State v. BoyerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2011
- Wilson v. CainCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- State v. ValeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1996
- State of Louisiana v. Jonathan Edward BoyerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2011