Legal Opinion

Costanzo Transp. Co. v. American Barge Line Co.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 11, 1940No. 81PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GIBSON, District Judge.

Under the admitted facts the one duty of the court is to determine what amount is properly awardable to the Libelant as salvage. The steamboat “Chickie”, under charter to the respondent, while towing seven loaded and four unloaded barges of the libelant down the Ohio River, had a number of those barges break away from it and proceed to drift down the river. Thereupon its master caused a signal of distress to be made, and the steamboat' “Costanzo”, then owned by the libelant, proceeded to land two barges which it was towing upstream and went to the aid of the “Chickie”,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Neel v. Iron City Sand Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1907

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. The Poling Bros. No. 6District Court, E.D. New York · 1942
  2. Vessel Judith Lee Rose, Inc. v. the American Oil Screw Vessel ClipperDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1959
  3. Nicastro v. the Gas Screw Peggy B.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1959
  4. Heuval v. The Barges Z408 & 463District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API