Legal Opinion

Union Guardian Trust Co. v. Rau

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1931No. Docket No. 97, Calendar No. 35,793PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.

On August 16, 1928, the defendant Litta W. Eau executed a promissory note, payable to the plaintiff, in the sum of $100,000, secured by a mortgage on certain real estate in the city of Detroit. Default having occurred in the payment of a part of the principal and of interest and taxes, this bill was filed for the foreclosure of the mortgage. It contained a provision under which the mortgagee in case of default was entitled—

“to the appointment by any competent court or tribunal, without notice to any party, of a receiver of the rents, issues and profits of the said premises with power to lease…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nusbaum v. ShaperoMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Jenks v. HortonMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Minnesota Building & Loan Ass'n v. MurphySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Detroit Trust Co. v. Detroit City Service Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
  2. American Trust Co. v. Michigan Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Massachusetts Mutual Life Ins. v. SuttonMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Stevens v. Mobil Oil Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1976
  5. Straus v. BarbeeMichigan Supreme Court · 1933

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API