Legal Opinion

Bullard v. State

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1873PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Ellis. Tried below before the Hon. Hardin Hart. • '

1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.

We need notice but one of the errors assigned for reversing this case.

The appellant was indicted for horse stealing in the District Court of Ellis county, and tried before a jury of thirteen men, convicted, and adjudged to suffer imprisonment in the penitentiary for the term of ten years. This is certainly" a very novel irregularity in a Texas court. Article 8007, Paschal’s Digest, declares “that the only mode of trial upon issues of fact in the Disirict Court is by a jury of twelve men, except in certain cases otherwise provided for.”

Similar cases have seldom occurred, but when they have…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cressey v. GiermanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1862
  2. Berry v. KenneyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1844

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. KaufmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1879
  2. McRae v. Grand Rapids, Lansing & Detroit RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1880
  4. Joe Luis Becerra v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2024
  5. Joe Luis Becerra v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2024

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API