Legal Opinion
Holley v. Colvin
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided September 30, 2013No. Civil Action No. 12-5357 (SRC)PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CHESLER, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Anita Holley, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1383(c)(3), 405(g), seeks review of the Commissioner of Social Security Administration’s (“the Commissioner”) decision denying her application for Social Security Disability Benefits. Plaintiff argues that the decision is not supported by substantial evidence and should be reversed. For the reasons set forth in this Opinion, this Court finds the Commissioner’s decision is supported by substantial evidence and will be affirmed.
*470PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On October 24, 2006, Plaintiff filed a Title II application…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Brault v. Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Ethel Burnett v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- ALLEN-NELSON v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2023
- ANDERSON v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020
- BARNETT v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2019
- BELVIN v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2025
- C.G. v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2026
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.