Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Hartford Fire Insurance

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1913No. 17,044PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the district court for Washington county: William A. Redick, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtRose, J.

This is an action to recover fire insurance under a contract of compromise and settlement fixing the loss at *449$711.11. For the term of one year from March 23, 1909, defendant insured plaintiff against loss by fire to the extent of $1,000 pn a linotype and $200 on a steretoyping plant, and authorized concurrent insurance, which was written in the Springfield Fire & Marine Insurance Company to the extent of $1,300 on the linotype and $200 on the stereotyping plant. The building containing the property was destroyed by fire April 27, 1909. Plaintiff pleaded a compromise and settlement of…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Deming v. NelsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Peterson v. Hartford Fire InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API