Legal Opinion

In Re Stuart

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 1926No. 19773. Department OnePublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

This is a proceeding in habeas corpus brought by appellants for the custody of Eugene Little, aged four and one-half years, then in the custody of his mother. On the return day of the show cause order granted upon filing the application, a motion to quash was sustained and the writ discharged. The sustaining of the motion to quash and discharge the writ is the only error assigned.

The petition alleges that the child, until immediately preceding the filing of the petition, had been in the custody of the petitioners; that the petitioners were the grandmother of the child and her husband; that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Barnes v. LongOregon Supreme Court · 1909
  2. McDonald v. ShortIndiana Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Porter v. PorterSupreme Court of Florida · 1910
  4. Brown v. RobertsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
  5. Morin v. MorinWashington Supreme Court · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. White v. SwinkMissouri Court of Appeals · 1953
  2. Moore v. BurdmanWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Roberts v. StaplesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
  4. In RE SCHREIFELS v. SchreifelsWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  5. In Re Application of WardWashington Supreme Court · 1952

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API