Legal Opinion
United States v. Poole
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided June 20, 2008No. 07-4220PublishedCited by 269 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Reversed and remanded with instructions by published opinion. Judge DUNCAN wrote the opinion, in which Judge MOTZ and Judge TRAXLER joined.
OPINION
DUNCAN, Circuit Judge:
This appeal presents the issue of whether a temporary custody arrangement can form the basis of a district court’s jurisdiction over a habeas petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241(c)(3). For the reasons that follow, we conclude that it does not, and that the measures taken by the district court to secure jurisdiction here were improper. We therefore reverse and remand with instructions to reinstate the original sentence.
A brief…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Rumsfeld v. PadillaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Bender v. Williamsport Area School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- James Charles, (98-5747), Movant (98-0539) v. Ernest v. Chandler, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by269 opinions
- United States v. Gerald WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
- Rice v. RiveraCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
- Angel Anariba v. Director Hudson County CorrectCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2021
- Dudley Bryant, Jr. v. Warden, FCC Coleman - MediumCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013
- Kanai v. McHughCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
264 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.