Jackson v. King

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Poster, C. J.:

The controversy in this case is over the right to certain funds, the rent of real estate, collected by a receiver. Both the district court and the court of appeals held against the claim of right to the rent made by the plaintiff in error. The last-named court based its judgment upon propositions of law which, for the sake of convenience to us in our consideration of the case, will be stated in their inverse order. The court ruled :

“Section 476, chapter 95, General Statutes of 1897, does not apply to mortgage liens after foreclosure, so *851as…