Legal Opinion

Langevin v. Bloom

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 16, 1897No. Nos. 10,636—(179)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal by defendant from a judgment for plaintiff in the district court for Polk county, entered pursuant to the order of Ives, J.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

The defendant, as constable, had levied on a buggy, the property of the plaintiff, on an execution on a .judgment rendered against him in favor of one Ellington. This judgment was rendered upon a promissory note given by plaintiff to Sylvester and Finseth, and by them transferred to Ellington. The note was given for the pur*23chase money of the buggy levied on. The buggy was exempt, unless subject to levy, under G. S. 1894, § 5460, which provides that

“the property hereinbefore mentioned is not exempt from any attachment issued in an action for the purchase money of the same property, or from an…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kinney v. Duluth Ore Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  2. Hammond v. PeytonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
  3. Judson v. ReardonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1871
  4. Rogers v. BrackettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gregory Co. v. CaleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
  2. Nickerson v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  3. In Re RadeDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1962
  4. Bofferding v. MengelkochSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  5. Johanson v. RowlandSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API