Robert E. Gonzales v. Ann McGill Gorsuch, Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KENNEDY, Circuit Judge:
This suit challenges the propriety of expenditures approved by the Environmental Protection Agency [EPA] and made by the Association of Bay Area Governments [ABAG].1 ABAG made the expenditures pursuant to a workplan under section 208 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (herein the Clean Water Act), 33 U.S.C. § 1288 (1976). EPA funded the plan through a $4.3 million grant authorized un*1265der section 208(f), 33 U.S.C. § 1288(f) (1976).
After the planning began, but before its completion, Gonzales2 brought this suit. The theory of the suit was that some of the grant…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Havens Realty Corp. v. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Rattlesnake Coalition v. U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Josiah L. Hoohuli v. George AriyoshiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Barnum Timber Co. v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Paul McMichael and Joseph A. Nichelini v. County of Napa and Napa County Board of SupervisorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- M. S. v. Kate BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.