Legal Opinion

Robert E. Gonzales v. Ann McGill Gorsuch, Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 28, 1982No. 78-3729PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KENNEDY, Circuit Judge:

This suit challenges the propriety of expenditures approved by the Environmental Protection Agency [EPA] and made by the Association of Bay Area Governments [ABAG].1 ABAG made the expenditures pursuant to a workplan under section 208 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (herein the Clean Water Act), 33 U.S.C. § 1288 (1976). EPA funded the plan through a $4.3 million grant authorized un*1265der section 208(f), 33 U.S.C. § 1288(f) (1976).

After the planning began, but before its completion, Gonzales2 brought this suit. The theory of the suit was that some of the grant…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Havens Realty Corp. v. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Rattlesnake Coalition v. U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  2. Josiah L. Hoohuli v. George AriyoshiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  3. Barnum Timber Co. v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  4. Paul McMichael and Joseph A. Nichelini v. County of Napa and Napa County Board of SupervisorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  5. M. S. v. Kate BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API