Legal Opinion

Alston v. . Hawkins

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1890PublishedCited by 11 opinions

This is a civil ACTION, which was tried before Boykin, J., at September Term, 1889, of WarreN Superior Court. The suit was upon a note, under seal, executed by the defendant to plaintiff’s testatrix on 4th August, 1856. There was a payment of $100, endorsed June 1st, 1866. The defendant relied upon the presumption of payment under the statute (Rev. Code, ch. 65, § 16), To rebut the presumption, the plaintiff showed that defendant has resided in Texas since the year 1857, and…

Read the full summary

This is a civil ACTION, which was tried before Boykin, J., at September Term, 1889, of WarreN Superior Court. The suit was upon a note, under seal, executed by the defendant to plaintiff’s testatrix on 4th August, 1856. There was a payment of $100, endorsed June 1st, 1866. The defendant relied upon the presumption of payment under the statute (Rev. Code, ch. 65, § 16), To rebut the presumption, the plaintiff showed that defendant has resided in Texas since the year 1857, and introduced, after objection, the following letter written by defendant: “ Caney Post-office, Matagorda Co., Tex.,…

1Opinion of the Court

Shepherd, J.:

-“The presumption of payment arising from lapse of time under the statute is one which the law itself makes, and it has such au artificial and technical weight that whenever the facts are admitted, or established, the Court 'must apply it as an inference or intendment of the law; and so, too, the question whether that presumption has been rebutted is one of law, which, when the facts are ascertained, the Court must determine, and not leave to the discretion of the jury.” RuffiN, J., in Grant v. Burgwyn, 84 N. C., 560.

It is well settled that when insolvency is relied upon to rebut…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Headen v. . WomackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
  2. Hodges v. . CouncilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
  3. Grant v. . BurgwynSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  4. Summerlin v. . CowlesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  5. Houck v. . AdamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Faggart v. . BostSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  2. Elliott v. Capital City State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  3. Cox v. . BrowerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  4. Fagan v. BachIllinois Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Morse v. National Central BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1926

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API