Legal Opinion

Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government v. Smolcic

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided August 26, 2004No. 2002-SC-0958-DG, 2002-SC-0972-DGPublished

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part 1

Opinion by

2Concurring in part, dissenting in part · KellerJustice Keller

I agree with the majority opinion that LFUCG’s liability was extinguished by its assertion of sovereign immunity, but for reasons expressed in my dissent in Jefferson County Commonwealth, Attorney’s Office v. Kaplan,1 I do not believe that LFUCG’s immunity precluded fault from being apportioned against it if justified by the evidence. “The majority’s contrary holding ... ‘violates the main purpose of comparative fault by improperly subjecting the [other] defendants to liability in excess of their proportion of fault.’ ”2 Accordingly, I dissent as to Part IV (Apportionment) of the…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Northland Insurance v. Truckstops Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
  2. JEFFERSON CTY. COM. ATTY'S OFFICE v. KaplanKentucky Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API