Legal Opinion
Honeycutt v. Bass
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided March 8, 1939No. 5888PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAMITER, Judge.
Exceptions of no cause and no right of action, filed herein by all defendants, were sustained and plaintiff perfected this appeal.
The purpose of the suit is to recover damages for injuries alleged to have been inflicted on plaintiff by fellow prisoners while he was an inmate of a jail. It is directed against the Marshal and Deputy Marshal of Winnfield, Louisiana, and the surety on the former’s bond.
The pertinent allegations of the petition are substantially as hereinafter stated.
While visiting in the Town of Winn-field, Winn Parish, Louisiana, on February 14, 1936, plaintiff, a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ratliff v. StanleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
- Eberhart v. MurphyWashington Supreme Court · 1920
- Hixon v. CuppSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1897
- Eberhart v. MurphyWashington Supreme Court · 1920
- Martin v. MageeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1934
3Cited by12 opinions
- Barlow v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1970
- St. Julian v. StateLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1957
- Shuff v. Zurich-American Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
- Muniz v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968
- St. Julian v. STATE, DEPT. OF INSTITUTIONSLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1955
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.