Legal Opinion

National Investors Life Insurance v. Tudor

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 9, 1978No. 78-52PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

George Howard, Jr., Justice.

We are to determine whether the verdict of the trial court, sitting without a jury, finding that appellant waived the requirement of reinstatement of a life insurance policy, after the policy had lapsed, resulting in a judgment in behalf of the appellee-beneficiary in the sum of $30,000.00, including 12% penalty and interest, and reasonable attorney’s fee in the amount of $3,000.00, is supported by substantial evidence.

A verdict supported by substantial evidence dictates an affirmance on appeal while, on the other hand, a reversal is required where the evidence…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Millers Mutual Fire Insurance Co. of Tex. v. RussellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
  2. Home Life & Accident Co. v. ScheuerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
  3. Union Life Ins. Co. v. BrewerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
  4. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co. v. McFarlandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hendrix v. Republic National Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1980
  2. Rini v. Oaklawn Jockey ClubDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1987
  3. Sandra Lawrence Dickerson v. The Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API