National Investors Life Insurance v. Tudor
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
George Howard, Jr., Justice.
We are to determine whether the verdict of the trial court, sitting without a jury, finding that appellant waived the requirement of reinstatement of a life insurance policy, after the policy had lapsed, resulting in a judgment in behalf of the appellee-beneficiary in the sum of $30,000.00, including 12% penalty and interest, and reasonable attorney’s fee in the amount of $3,000.00, is supported by substantial evidence.
A verdict supported by substantial evidence dictates an affirmance on appeal while, on the other hand, a reversal is required where the evidence…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Millers Mutual Fire Insurance Co. of Tex. v. RussellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
- Home Life & Accident Co. v. ScheuerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
- Union Life Ins. Co. v. BrewerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
- Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co. v. McFarlandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hendrix v. Republic National Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1980
- Rini v. Oaklawn Jockey ClubDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1987
- Sandra Lawrence Dickerson v. The Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980