Montgomery v. Thomson
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order refusing a new trial. J. M. Seawell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFARLAND, J.
This is an action to recover $2620.80 and interest for an alleged balance due plaintiff from defendant for the sale by the former to the latter of a certain amount of cords of brush to be used by defendant in certain levee work at Sherman.Island. The case was tried without a jury, and the court made findings and rendered judgment as prayed for in the complaint. From the judgment and from an order denying his motion for a new trial defendant appeals.
On September 12, 1901, a written contract was executed between plaintiff as party of the first part and defendant as party of the second part. The…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Compressed Air MacHinery Co. v. West San Pablo Land & Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1908
- Albrecht v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930