State v. Saunders

¶1 — Reginald Saunders appeals his judgment and sentence for assault in the third degree, domestic violence, and malicious mischief in the third degree, domestic violence. He contends that the assault statute is unconstitutionally vague and that there was insufficient evidence to convict him of assault. Saunders also claims that his Sixth Amendment right was violated by the admission of the nontestifying victim’s 911 call, and testimony regarding *597the victim’s statements to a police officer, a paramedic, and an emergency room physician. He also argues that the court erred in admitting the…