Legal Opinion

Wyse v. Russell

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided February 15, 1896PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from judgment of Sixth Judicial District Court in favor of defendants. • Action for rent.

1Opinion of the CourtBischoff, J.

The defendants are husband and wife, and . together occupied rooms in the plaintiff’s house under a vúitten lease,; but, having left the premises .prior to its expiration, this action was. brought, to recover the rent claimed to have thereafter accrued.

'Two defenses were litigated — eviction and a cancellation of the contract, and the justice below found in favor of the defendants..The record satisfies us that this conclusion was not incorrect) since,-while there was. the customary conflict of evidence as to the main facts, ample grounds for. finding a constructive, eviction appeared..' !.Iti…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sully v. . SchmittNew York Court of Appeals · 1895

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Finck v. RogersAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API