Legal Opinion

Harrison v. Snair

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 19, 1889PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Union District Court. — Hon. R. 0. Henry, Judge. Action of replevin. There was a judgment upon a verdict for defendant. Plaintiff, appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.

1. pbactioe: appeal^ *or filing- . — I. The defendant' moves the court to strike from the abstract all of the evidence in the case, on fhe ground that it is not of record in the court below. The defendant, in support of this motion, shows that no translation of

the short-hand reporter’s notes has been filed in the court below. The short-hand notes were deposited in due time in the court below, though not marked “filed.” As to the notes, this is sufficient. But no translation thereof has ever been deposited in the clerk’s office. The evidence does not become a part of the record until the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lowe v. LoweSupreme Court of Iowa · 1875
  2. McCarthy v. Watrous & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1886
  3. Gibbs v. BuckinghamSupreme Court of Iowa · 1878
  4. Wadsworth & Co. v. First Nat. BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1887

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Slone v. BerlinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893
  2. Hopkins Fine Stock Co. v. ReidSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API