Legal Opinion

Strother Ford, Inc. v. Bullock

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 27, 1977No. 54049Published

1Opinion

On Motion for Rehearing.

It is respectfully submitted that the refusal to direct a verdict as to fraudulent misrepresentation was harmful because the jury award of damages was predicated on a rescission of the contract. It is urged that the measure of damages in a trover action will not authorize the award under the facts of this case. We disagree.

The evidence here demanded a finding of conversion.

"As between the original purchaser and seller the agreed contract price is prima facie evidence of actual value and in a trover action is sufficient, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kirkland v. Chrysler Credit Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API