Legal Opinion

Key Bank v. Concepion

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided March 23, 1994No. C93-1737RPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING UNITED STATES’ REQUEST TO GIVE NOTICE OF PERMIT SANCTION

ROTHSTEIN, Chief Judge.

I. BACKGROUND

In September of 1991, the United States commenced an in rem civil forfeiture action *846under the Magnuson Fishery Conservation and Management Act, 16 U.S.C. § 1860, against the vessel Concepcion, contending it had fished in closed waters. The owners, Alaska Command Processor Limited Partnership, contested the allegations but settled for $175,000, of which $100,000 was in the form of a promissory note secured by a preferred ship mortgage. The forfeiture action was dismissed with prejudice on…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. AckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Papaliolios v. DurningDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1950
  3. Maryland International, S.A. v. Proceeds of the Sale of the S.S.District Court, E.D. New York · 1962

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Farm Credit East, ACA v. F/V Market Price (O.N. 1275363), in rem, et al.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API