State v. Anaya
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SPIESS, Chief Judge.
Convicted of the theft of automobile tires from an automobile, Sec. 64 — 9-4, N.M. S.A.1953 (Rpl. Vol. 9, pt. 2), defendant, Anaya, has appealed. Anaya’s contention is that the tires were obtained through an unreasonable search and seizure in violation of constitutional guarantees and their admission in evidence was prejudicial error. We affirm the judgment and conviction.
The undisputed material facts are: Officers of the Albuquerque Police Department were informed that a suspected theft of tires from automobiles at a used car lot was in progress. The officers…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- State v. CarltonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1971
- State v. MillerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. PowellNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1983
- State v. LunaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978
- State v. AnayaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
- State v. LeeNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972