Legal Opinion

Evans v. Newton

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 28, 1964No. 22534PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Almand, Justice.

Counsel for the plaintiffs in error (the Negro intervenors) assert that the decree of the judge of the superior court was “patent enforcement of racial discrimination contrary to the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment” to the Federal Constitution. The decree did not enforce, or purport to enforce, any judgment, ruling, or decree as related to the intervenors. After determining that all parties were properly before the court, the decree did two things: (1) Accepted the resignation of the City of Macon as trustee of Baconsfield; and (2) appointed new trustees.

“Th…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Jones v. HabershamSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Pennsylvania v. Board of Directors of City Trusts of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. United States v. Central Eureka Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Girard College TrusteeshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  5. Smith v. ManningSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Evans v. NewtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Evans v. AbneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Coffee v. William Marsh Rice UniversityTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Evans v. AbneySupreme Court of Georgia · 1968
  5. Evans v. NewtonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API