Legal Opinion · Dissent

Howard v. Hachigian

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 17, 1982Published

1Dissent

Yesawich, Jr., J.

(dissenting). We view the accident itself as the occurrence or operative transaction from which Royal Howard’s claimed harm emanates. Since the original complaint gave defendants notice, well within the limitations period, that they were being charged with negligently causing that collision, and the inclusion of a cause of action for his own personal injuries will not appreciably enlarge the scope of proof or alter relevant legal consideration of the liability issue, his personal injury cause of action was not time barred (Caffaro v Trayna, 35 NY2d 245, 251; Andrews v…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Caffaro v. TraynaNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. Andrews v. DonabellaNew York Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Whalen v. Drillco Equipment Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API