Legal Opinion

Helvering v. Price

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 25, 1940No. 559PublishedCited by 173 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Hughes

Respondent in his income tax return for 1932 claimed a deduction for a loss upon a contract of guaranty. The Board of Tax Appeals sustained the Commissioner in refusing to allow the deduction, and the Circuit Court of Appeals reversed. 106 F. 2d 336. Because of an alleged conflict with Eckert v. Burnet, 283 U. S. 140, Jenkins v. Bitgood, C. C. A. 2d, 101 F. 2d 17, and Ferris v. Commissioner, C. C. A. 2d, 102 F. 2d 985, we granted certiorari, 308 U. S. 548.

The facts as found may be thiis summarized: In 1929 the Atlantic Bank and Trust. Company of Greensboro, North Carolina, was merged with the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Eckert v. BurnetSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Jenkins v. BitgoodCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
  3. Ferris v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
  4. Price v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1939

3Cited by173 opinions

  1. Putnam v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Don E. Williams Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Nat Harrison Assoc., Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1964
  4. Goodstein v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1958
  5. Howard B. Quinn and Charlotte J. Quinn v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975

168 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API