Legal Opinion

Tidd v. Grimes

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 7, 1903No. 12,989PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from Stafford district court; Ansel R. Clark, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

*402The opinidn of the court was delivered by

Smith, J. :

This was an action of ejectment. The plaintiff below based his right to possession on a tax deed. The trial court held that the deed was invalid for the reason that the tax-sale notice,upon which the deed was based was published for twenty-five days only before the sale, but found that it was printed once in each week during four consecutive weeks prior to the day of sale, the first publication being on August 6, the second on August 13, the third on August 20, and the fourth on August 27. The sale was had on September 1.

The tax law (Gen.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Early v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
  2. Dexter v. ShepardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
  3. Watkins v. IngeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880
  4. Frothingham v. MarchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1804

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hartzler v. City of GoodlandSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  2. Jackson v. GussSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
  3. Myakka Co. v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Florida · 1914
  4. Peck v. Wm. M. Birch Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API