Legal Opinion · Dissent

Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Harris

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 1982No. D.D. No. 82-18Published

1DissentKrupansky, J.

I believe, at the very least, respondent’s conduct mandates he be indefinitely suspended from the practice of law. Consequently, I must dissent from the majority’s decision adopting the recommendation of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline to suspend respondent from the practice of law for a period of only one year. •

DR 1-102(A)(3) provides an attorney shall not “[e]ngage in illegal conduct involving moral turpitude.” In determining whether the illegal conduct in question involves moral turpitude, as well as in deciding upon the appropriate disciplinary action which should…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. ShottOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Ohio State Bar Ass'n v. MackayOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Bar Ass'n of Greater Cleveland v. SimpsonOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. KlatchOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. CorriganOhio Supreme Court · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API