Dupre v. Reggio
Supreme Court of Louisiana
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT. The plaintiff alleges he is the transferee by notarial act of all the rights of J. M. Benoit, and his two brothers to the succession of the late Eloi Hacher, who were his heirs instituted by his will; that A. Reggio the late husband of the defendant confessed judgment, by notarial act, which is annexed, and acknowledged to be indebted to said succession in the sum of seven thousand dollars, payable at the expiration of…
Read the full summary
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT. The plaintiff alleges he is the transferee by notarial act of all the rights of J. M. Benoit, and his two brothers to the succession of the late Eloi Hacher, who were his heirs instituted by his will; that A. Reggio the late husband of the defendant confessed judgment, by notarial act, which is annexed, and acknowledged to be indebted to said succession in the sum of seven thousand dollars, payable at the expiration of five years from the 29th of February 1828; and the defendant widow Reggio, common in property with her minor children are…
1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.
The plaintiff states that one Hacher made his last will and testament, and after bequeathing several legacies, the residue of his estate he gave to his three nephews with the benefit of accretion to the survivors or survivor ofítbem; and that the legacies were paid by the testamentary executor, who liquidated the estate and who was discharged by the Court of Probates. That one of the instituted heirs and'residuary legatees, transferred, for a valuable co|ttjderation, all his right and interest in the succession to th&piaintiff, (the other two heirs their existence being unknowi^ or being…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Vicksburg, S. & P. R. v. TibbsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1904
- Succession of WilliamsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1920