Legal Opinion

Rose City Mercantile Company v. Miller

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 11, 1926PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Certain preliminary pleadings and motions were filed in this cause and are discussed in the briefs, but a stipulation filed upon the submission of the case in the court below renders it unnecessary to consider them. In this stipulation it was agreed “that this cause shall be tried as a suit brought for the purpose of enforcing the rent lien of plaintiffs against defendant for cotton appropriated by it on which the rent had not been paid ’ ’

In support of this cause of action the plaintiffs offered testimony to the following effect: Mrs. H. T. Urquhart, by written contract, leased her farm to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Reavis v. BarnesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1880
  2. Walker v. RoseSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
  3. Foster v. BradneySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
  4. Bigham v. CrossSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1901
  5. Sledge & Norfleet Co. v. HughesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mark v. MaberrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1953
  2. Lybarger v. LieblongSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
  3. Silbernagel v. TaliaferroSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API