Legal Opinion · Dissent

Gwinn v. Hobbs

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 14, 1923No. 11,613Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion.

Remy, C. J.

I cannot concur in the decision reached by a majority of this court. Some of the questions decided are questions which were, or might have been, decided on the former appeal, and, as I believe, were improperly considered. Stevens v. Templeton (1910), 174 Ind. 129, 91 N. E. 563. Even if the case would have to be reversed because of any error, I could not concur in the opinion, for, in my judgment, wrong conclusions . are reached on certain questions, which conclusions would be prejudicial to appellees on a retrial. It is not my purpose to write a dissenting…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Shipman v. FurnissSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
  2. Vandalia Coal Co. v. CoakleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Stevens v. TempletonIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Duguid v. ColdsnowIndiana Court of Appeals · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API