David v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals Board

Markewich, J. (dissenting.)

At the outset, it should be said that the majority memorandum states the facts fairly. There is, however, the possibility that it *583may be inferred therefrom that the original lease actually contained a provision granting an option respecting the garage; it did not. We are given brief pause by the separate concurrence which argues that the Conciliation and Appeals Board (CAB) did not fulfill a supposed duty of “trying to reconcile differences” between the parties. The title of the board is a misnomer. One may search the Rent Stabilization Law, the Code of the Rent…