Legal Opinion

State v. Miller

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 18, 2009No. 060633848; A134139PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, P. J.

After a jury trial in 2006, defendant was convicted of nine sex offenses committed in 1995, when defendant was 17 years old and the victim was seven or eight years old. After the jury rendered its verdict, the trial court dismissed the jury and sentenced defendant to concurrent and consecutive sentences totaling 175 months in prison based on its own findings. Defendant appeals, raising two assignments of error: (1) that there was insufficient evidence for a jury to find beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant’s crimes were committed on or after the effective date for Measure 11 sentencing…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Oregon v. IceSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. State v. HallOregon Supreme Court · 1998

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. McNallCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  2. State v. OlsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API