Legal Opinion

Horne v. Horne

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 29, 1964No. 450PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDenny, C.J.

The question posed for determination on this appeal is whether or not the respondent Jesse Brady Horne is entitled to have the entire 46 acre tract of land partitioned between the two tenants in common, subject to the dower of Hettie Griffin Horne.

It is provided in pertinent part by G.S. 46-15: “When there is dower or right of dower on any land, petitioned to be sold or divided in sever-alty by actual partition, the woman entitled to dower or right of dower therein may join in the petition. The land to be divided in severalty shall be allotted to the tenants in common * * * subject to the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Baggett v. . JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  2. Seawell v. SeawellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. Hyman v. . EdwardsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  4. Seaman v. Seaman.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
  5. Luther v. . LutherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Funderburk v. JusticeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API