Legal Opinion

Olson v. Orton

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 17, 1881PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for the counties of Stevens, Big Stone and Traverse, refusing a new trial, after a trial before Brown, J., and a jury.

1Opinion of the Court

Gilfillan, C. J.*

Action for deceit. Defendant was in possession, for the purpose of pre-empting, of certain lands of the United States subject to pre-emption, had filed in the local land-office his statement declaring his intention to pre-empt the lands, and had made improvements thereon. In November, 1876, for a valuable consideration, he sold to, plaintiff all his right, title and interest in the land, *37and abandoned the same in- his favor, so that he might take possession. The purpose manifestly was that defendant should surrender his possession and improvements to plaintiff, so that the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Porter v. FletcherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Wheeler v. BaarsSupreme Court of Florida · 1894
  2. Stearns v. KennedySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  3. Hoock v. BowmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  4. BOARD OF PUBLIC INSTRUC. v. Everett W. Martin & SonSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  5. Coleman v. the Territory of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1897

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API