Legal Opinion

Attorney-General v. Katz

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 23, 1982PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs and without prejudice to an application by respondents to Special Term for the vacation of the injunction order of March 19,1980 in light of the commencement of the plenary action.

The Appellate Division has the same discretion as does Special Term in deciding whether an injunction order should be vacated and may, by way of reviewing the action of Special Term, modify its order in the exercise of discretion even though it cannot be said that Special Term abused its discretion (Kover v Kover, 29…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kover v. KoverNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. O'Connor v. PapertsianNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
  3. Phoenix Mutual Life Insurance v. ConwayNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
  4. Gutin v. Mascali & Sons, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1962

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. MATTER OF ATTORNEY-GEN. OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK v. KatzNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. In Re SchickUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API