Legal Opinion

Oregon Traffic Safety Now, Inc. v. Roberts

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 24, 1987No. SC S34451Published

1Per curiam

Petitioners challenge a ballot title prepared by the Attorney General for a referendum measure seeking voter approval of amendments to ORS 811.210.1 Pursuant to ORS *400250.035 and 250.065, the Attorney General drafted the following ballot title:

*401“REQUIRES THE USE OF SAFETY BELTS
“Question: Shall law, effective December 8,1988, require safety belt use by motor vehicle drivers and passengers over 16?
“Explanation: Referred to voters. Approval enacts law requiring that motor vehicle drivers wear safety belts and secure passengers under 16 with safety belts, harnesses, or small child safety…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kafoury v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Portland General Electric Co. v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API