Maloof v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BONE, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from a conviction of a violation oí a maximum rent regulation1 promulgated pursuant to the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942, as amended.2 The issue herein is whether the information stated sufficient facts to constitute a crime and adequately inform the appellant of what she was charged. The record on appeal fails to disclose that appellant made objections as to the adequacy of the information during or prior to the trial of the case. Omitting the formalities, the information was as follows:
“ * * * informs this Court: That Zerefa Maloof, (hereinafter…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. CruikshankSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Dunbar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- United States v. BrittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Myers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
- United States v. Pepper Bros.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Todorow v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- United States v. ShibleyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1953
- Kempe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1947
- Fippin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947